<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pixel Vector Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Pixel Vector - The Web Development Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:38:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>IE6. Thank you and Goodnight?</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/07/08/ie6-thank-you-and-goodnight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/07/08/ie6-thank-you-and-goodnight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Blyth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Statistics published in June indicate that Internet Explorer 6 usage has dropped significantly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regular readers of our <a href="http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog" title="Blog">Blog</a> will know that in recent months we have given coverage to (and have been suitably excited about&#8230;) the apparent death of Internet Explorer 6. Statistics published by StatCounter last month now indicate that IE6 has less than a 5% market share in the US and Europe.</p>
<p>Internet Explorer 6 (IE6) is a particular version of of Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer web browser which has caused web developers headaches for the past decade. Despite this version of the software being over 10 years old &#8211; and actually two versions out of date following the launch of 7 and 8 &#8211; IE6 remained one of the most popular web browsers until very recently.</p>
<p>The latest statistics indicate that users of the troublesome browser are finally on the decline, with people upgrading to Windows Vista and/or Windows 7 &#8211; both supplied with newer, more capable web browsers. The growth of other browsers such as Apple Safari, Google Chrome and Firefox has also had an impact on IE6.</p>
<p>Based on an analysis of 15 billion page views in May 2010, StatCounter’s numbers indicate that IE6 usage in the U.S. has fallen to as low as 4.7% from 11.5% in the last 12 months.</p>
<p>As far as other web browsers go, IE8 holds 30.49% market share in the U.S., followed by Firefox 3.6 with 19.85% and IE7 with 16.64% market share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/07/08/ie6-thank-you-and-goodnight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing fflap&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/04/22/introducing-fflap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/04/22/introducing-fflap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Blyth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Project Launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fflap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone Web App]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web App]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pixel Vector are pleased to announce the launch of fflap - a Web Applciation designed as a Social Media Marketing Tool for eBay.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Picture-1-299x198.png" alt="" title="Picture 1" width="299" height="198" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-66" align="right" />Since our last blog update the Pixel Vector offices have been a hive of activity! One of our main focuses has been developing a brand new web application called fflap</p>
<p>fflap is primarily a social media marketing for eBay &#8211; <strong>utilising the eBay and Twitter APIs</strong> to harness the buying power of your Twitter followers.</p>
<p>fflap users are able to retrieve their own or somebody else&#8217;s listings directly from eBay and publish them to all of their followers on Twitter &#8211; increasing their chance of selling them item. Basic accounts are free to create but there are also an additional two monthly subscription levels, each offering further benefits to the user.</p>
<p>After meeting strict requirements, <strong>fflap has been recognised by eBay as a &#8216;quality Web 2.0 application&#8217;</strong> and proudly displays official eBay logos: &#8220;By completing the Compatible Application Check you&#8217;ll know that your application will provide your users with a strong eBay experience and that you&#8217;ve made the most efficient use of the APIs you&#8217;ve implemented.&#8221;</p>
<p>In addition, fflap will also offer users a fully-functional iPhone Web App &#8211; stay tuned for more updates on this aspect of the project.</p>
<p>To see more of fflap, please;<br />
Visit <a href="http://fflap.com" target="_blank">fflap.com</a><br />
or Follow <a href="http://twitter.com/fflap" target="_blank">fflap on Twitter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/04/22/introducing-fflap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash is Dying. Or is it?</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/03/05/is-flash-dying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/03/05/is-flash-dying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Blyth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple and Youtube have signalled their intent to support HTML5 Video but does that mean the end for Adobe Flash?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For many years Adobe Flash has been part of the fixtures &amp; fittings when it comes to <a title="Web Development by Pixel Vector" href="http://www.pixelvector.co.uk">web development</a> &#8211; many developers fully embrace the animated glory that Flash can enhance a website with, whereas others prefer the hardcore satisfaction of building websites entirely in code (not to mention the Accessibility and <a title="Search Engine Optimisation" href="http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/search-engine-optimisation.php">SEO</a> benefits&#8230;)</p>
<p>Recent developments in JavaScript Libraries such as jQuery have enabled designers and developers to achieve many things in &#8220;good clean code&#8221; that used to reserved for those building in Flash, however there was still a place for Flash &#8211; the most of common being video content. Just about every video service, including YouTube, provides video embedding via the use of Flash. Or did&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reelseo.com/youtube-embracing-html-5/" target="_blank">YouTube recently announced it&#8217;s decision to experiment with HTML 5 Video Embedding</a>, an alarming sign for Adobe and Flash. HTML 5 video embedding (when more widely supported) will enable developers to embed video into a web-page without the need for Flash.</p>
<p>Furthermore, Adobe have faced additional criticism and pressure from Apple Supremo, Steve Jobs. Apple have refused to support Flash on the iPhone since it&#8217;s launch more than two years ago &#8211; and an alleged recent outburst at the Wall Street Journal goes some way to explaining why: Steve Jobs “called Flash a ‘CPU hog,’ a source of ’security holes’ and a dying technology. ‘We don’t spend a lot of energy on old technology,’ Jobs said.&#8221;</p>
<p>While Jobs is renowned for being an innovator, might he be looking a bit too far forward this time?</p>
<p>HTML5, is (currently) plagued with issues, not least the fact that most browsers do not have HTML5 support (the only browsers that can play Youtube’s HTML5 demo videos are Google Chrome, Apple Safari 4 and Internet Explorer 8 (with Google Frame). And even with the aforementioned browsers, Youtube’s video plays like a slide show.</p>
<p>In addition, Flash is so widespread that any change away from the standard will take years. Even if Apple, YouTube and (probably) Google throw their significant, collective weight behind the move, it will still be nigh on impossible to make the move any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/03/05/is-flash-dying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tools of the Trade</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/01/18/tools-of-the-trade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/01/18/tools-of-the-trade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Blyth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pixel Vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From time-to-time here at Pixel Vector we get asked by clients 'how' we make websites - which tools and applications etc. do we use. So, partly inspired by <a href="http://www.gracesmith.co.uk/show-me-your-dock-series-part-30/">Grace Smith's interesting 'Show me Your Dock' Series</a>, I've put together a little guide to how we get things done at Pixel Vector!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From time-to-time here at Pixel Vector we get asked by clients &#8216;how&#8217; we make websites &#8211; which tools and applications etc. do we use. So, partly inspired by <a href="http://www.gracesmith.co.uk/show-me-your-dock-series-part-30/" target="_blank">Grace Smith&#8217;s interesting &#8216;Show me Your Dock&#8217; Series</a>, I&#8217;ve put together a little guide to how we get things done at Pixel Vector!</p>
<p><strong>Mac or PC?</strong><br />
A debate that could quite easily take up several blog posts itself! The short answer is quite simply &#8211; both. We primarily use Macs, however our programmers prefer PCs. We actually have a lone Windows laptop whose only purpose is for testing web-pages on Internet Explorer (for more on this please see my post on <a href="http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/01/04/the-slow-death-of-ie6/">IE6</a>) and e-mail marketing on Outlook.</p>
<p>Personally, I moved to Mac 7 or 8 years ago and I wouldn&#8217;t go back to using PC&#8217;s (for anything other than testing!)</p>
<p><strong>Applications</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/dock1.png"><img src="http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/dock1.png" alt="" title="dock" width="471" height="73" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-41" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/dock-2.png"><img src="http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/dock-2.png" alt="" title="dock 2" width="488" height="73" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-42" /></a></p>
<p>Above is my Mac&#8217;s Dock &#8211; these are the applications I use on a daily basis. From left to right;</p>
<p><strong>Finder</strong><br />
Finder is the file browser on the Mac &#8211; I personally don&#8217;t have any problems with the way it works &#8211; so I stick to it!</p>
<p><strong>Mail</strong><br />
Apple Mail is the default e-mail application for the Mac and I personally prefer it over the alternatives. I find the Smart folders especially useful for filtering through e-mail relating to different projects.</p>
<p><strong>Address Book</strong><br />
Another Apple product. I like how Address book seamlessly integrates with Mail and iCal &#8211; there are also extensions for syncing with Google Contacts &#8211; which are very useful for working remotely. Finally, integration with my iPhone is very important!</p>
<p><strong>iCal</strong><br />
I use iCal to schedule meetings. We operate a shared calendar which is synced across the office which is particularly useful.</p>
<p><strong>Adium</strong><br />
<a href="http://adium.im/" target="_blank">Adium</a> is my personal messaging application of choice. It combines multiple IM&#8217;s such as GoogleTalk, MSN, Yahoo, AIM etc. Plus the icon looks pretty cool!</p>
<p><strong>Safari</strong><br />
Safari is currently my &#8216;personal&#8217; browser of choice &#8211; It&#8217;s so quick and elegant compared to some of the alternatives and it is become more and more powerful to develop web pages, however Firefox is still better&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Firefox</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.getfirefox.com" target="_blank">Firefox</a> is my daily &#8216;development&#8217; browser. I&#8217;d be stuck without some of the plugins &#8211; especially Web Developer and Firebug. I also use <a href="http://www.foxmarks.com/" target="_blank">Foxmarks</a>, which syncs my bookmarks between Safari and Firefox.</p>
<p><strong>Tweetie</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.atebits.com/tweetie-mac/" target="_blank">Tweetie</a> is my preferred Twitter Client &#8211; I use both the desktop and iPhone client.</p>
<p><strong>Spotify</strong><br />
Only in the last 6 months have I discovered <a href="http://www.spotify.com/en/" target="_blank">Spotify</a> &#8211; until recently you would have found my iTunes icon here! Spotify is fantastic (even with the ads) and their music catalgoue is growing all the time.</p>
<p><strong>OpenOffice</strong><br />
I&#8217;ve found myself using <a href="http://www.openoffice.org" target="_blank">OpenOffice</a> far more than Word these days. The majority of our site plans, quotations and technical specs are written in OpenOffice.</p>
<p><strong>OmniGraffle</strong><br />
I use <a href="http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/OmniGraffle/" target="_blank">OmniGraffle</a> to produce great-looking site maps. Site maps are especially key when planning complex web applications and the OmniGraffle interface is great to use.</p>
<p><strong>Preview</strong><br />
When I think about it, I use Preview a hell of a lot! Any images I quickly need to look at or crop, any PDFs etc. &#8211; all get dropped into Preview.</p>
<p><strong>Fireworks</strong><br />
Others will disagree&#8230; but I still prefer Fireworks as a graphics application for web graphics. I am still running MX2004 here but it still does a great job!</p>
<p><strong>Photoshop</strong><br />
While I prefer Fireworks, the majority of design work at Pixel Vector is done in Photoshop. My job regularly involves taking photoshop layouts and coding these up in CSS and HTML.</p>
<p><strong>TextWrangler</strong><br />
About a year ago I stopped using Dreamweaver for buidling web-pages &amp; CSS and moved to <a href="http://www.barebones.com/products/TextWrangler/" target="_blank">TextWrangler</a> &#8211; a pretty basic text editor. I find that coding in this environment is much more flexible and a lot quicker!</p>
<p><strong>MAMP</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.mamp.info/en/index.html" target="_blank">MAMP</a> is used for testing dynamic websites locally.</p>
<p><strong>TextEdit</strong><br />
I leave TextEdit here in case I need to make any quick notes.</p>
<p><strong>Transmit</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.panic.com/TRANSMIT/" target="_blank">Transmit</a> is my preferred FTP client for the Mac.</p>
<p><strong>HP Scan Pro</strong><br />
Used for scanning!!!</p>
<p><strong>Digital ColourMeter</strong><br />
A nice little app. hidden in the Utilties folder of your Mac &#8211; I use this to source colour hex codes, usually from mock ups or existing web pages.</p>
<p><strong>Terminal</strong><br />
Used for accessing certain servers.</p>
<p><strong>Browsers (Stack)</strong><br />
This stack includes links to all the browsers I test on for Mac; Camino, Fennec, Firefox, Flock, Fluid, Chrome, iPhoney, Navigator, Opera, Safari, SeaMonkey, Shiira, Stainless and Sunrise.</p>
<p><strong>Applications (Stack)</strong><br />
A link to all the apps on my Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/01/18/tools-of-the-trade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple’s App Approval Process Getting Speedy</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/01/13/apple%e2%80%99s-app-approval-process-getting-speedy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/01/13/apple%e2%80%99s-app-approval-process-getting-speedy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Carroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Iphone latest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TUAW recently remarked that the App Store approval process seemed to be working much faster lately. TiPb has been in contact with numerous application developers and the general overall feel we are getting is the same — Apple is finally coming around when it comes to the app approval process. Much has been said about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TUAW recently remarked that the App Store approval process seemed to be working much faster lately. TiPb has been in contact with numerous application developers and the general overall feel we are getting is the same — Apple is finally coming around when it comes to the app approval process. Much has been said about Apple and their App Store over the past few years but things have seemingly changed for the better.<br />
TiPb sometimes gets access to beta applications for feedback or review anywhere from a month to a week in advance. Generally we’ve seen the same 2 week delay Apple advises before the apps show up in the App Store (though sometimes it’s been up to 4 weeks or more in the past). Lately we have received an app only to find it released only a day later, sometimes hours later depending on the app itself.<br />
What has brought about this speed boost we have no idea but we welcome it regardless and hope it continues.</p>
<p><strong>Thanks to theiphoneblog.com for this link</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pixelvector.co.uk/blog/2010/01/13/apple%e2%80%99s-app-approval-process-getting-speedy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
